Jira vs Asana Pricing 2026
Complete pricing comparison between Jira and Asana. Find out which project management tool is right for you.
Jira pricing ranges from $0–$30/user/month, while Asana ranges from $0–$50/user/month. Jira is typically 36% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.
The right choice between Jira and Asana depends on your specific requirements: team size, feature needs, and integration requirements all affect which option delivers better value.
See the tier-by-tier breakdown below to compare specific plans, or use our calculators to estimate costs: Jira calculator | Asana calculator
Jira and Asana are two of the most widely adopted project management platforms, but they are built for different audiences. Jira is the go-to tool for software development teams practicing Agile methodologies, with deep support for Scrum, Kanban, sprints, and bug tracking. Asana is designed for cross-functional teams across marketing, operations, and product management, with strengths in workflow automation, goal tracking, and portfolio management. Jira Standard starts at $8.15/user/month while Asana Starter costs $10.99/user/month, though their total cost of ownership depends heavily on what additional tools each team needs alongside the core platform.
Pricing Tier Comparison
| Tier | Jira | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free /user/month | Free /user/month |
| Standard | $8.15 /user/month | $13.49 /user/month |
| Premium | $16 /user/month | $30.49 /user/month |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
| Enterprise+ | — | Custom |
Not sure between Jira and Asana?
Tell us about your needs and we'll recommend the best option for your budget.
Our Verdict
Choose Jira if your primary users are software developers and engineers, you practice Agile methodologies (Scrum or Kanban), you need deep integration with development tools like Bitbucket, GitHub, or CI/CD pipelines, or you are already invested in the Atlassian ecosystem with Confluence and other products.
Choose Asana if your primary users are non-engineering teams such as marketing, operations, or product management. Asana is the better choice when you need intuitive workflow automation, cross-project portfolio visibility, OKR and goal tracking, workload management for resource planning, and a clean interface that non-technical team members can adopt quickly without training.
Frequently Asked Questions
01 Is Jira cheaper than Asana?
At the base tier, yes. Jira Standard at $8.15/user/month is cheaper than Asana Starter at $10.99/user/month. However, most Jira teams also need Confluence ($5.75+/user/month) for documentation, which Asana does not require. When you factor in the full Atlassian stack, total costs become comparable or even higher than Asana for non-engineering teams.
02 Should non-technical teams use Jira or Asana?
Asana is almost always the better choice for non-technical teams. Its interface is intuitive, it requires minimal training, and features like Workflow Builder, Portfolios, and Goals are designed for marketing, operations, and cross-functional teams. Jira's complexity and developer-focused interface often frustrate non-technical users and require significant configuration to work for general project management.
03 Can a company use both Jira and Asana?
Yes, and many companies do. A common pattern is engineering teams using Jira for sprint planning and bug tracking while marketing, product, and operations teams use Asana for their workflows. Both tools integrate with each other through native integrations and Zapier, allowing cross-functional visibility. The trade-off is managing two tool subscriptions and ensuring consistent processes across platforms.