IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
SIEM pricing comparison · 2026
IBM QRadar pricing ranges from $5000–$250000/annual enterprise, while Microsoft Sentinel ranges from $2.46–$5.20/GB ingested. Microsoft Sentinel is typically 100% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.
Sources & confidence
Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.
Plans at a glance
Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.
Contract terms
The fine print, surfaced. Green = buyer-friendly. Each clause backed by a quoted source.
What users say
Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.
IBM QRadar and Microsoft Sentinel both operate in the siem category. This page compares their list pricing.
Plan-by-Plan Pricing
| Plan | IBM QRadar | Microsoft Sentinel |
|---|---|---|
| Events per Second (EPS) Model | Custom | $5.20 /per GB ingested |
| Flows per Minute (FPM) Model | Custom | $2.96 /per GB with commitment |
| Managed Virtual Servers (MVS) | Custom | $2.46 /per GB with high-volume commitment |
| Enterprise Deployment | Custom | — |
Cost at Scale
Total cost of ownership — licenses, implementation, and hidden costs included.
IBM QRadar
3 scenariosMicrosoft Sentinel
4 scenariosContract Terms
| Term | IBM QRadar | Microsoft Sentinel |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-renewal | — | — |
| Cancellation | 30, 60, or 90 days | — |
| Minimum commitment | Some Enterprise License Agreements (ELAs) may include minimum spend commitments. | Commitment tiers require daily volume commitments; Pay-As-You-Go has no minimum commitment |
| Price escalation | 3-5% per year, sometimes 5-10% | Users report ~10% annual price increases on Azure services; tier restructuring has caused effective 30% cost increases through deprecation of lower-cost tiers |