Lever vs Ashby Pricing 2026
Complete pricing comparison between Lever and Ashby. Find out which ai recruiting tool is right for you.
Lever pricing ranges from $5000–$140000/year, while Ashby ranges from $0–$2000/month. Ashby is typically 97% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.
The right choice between Lever and Ashby depends on your specific requirements: team size, feature needs, and integration requirements all affect which option delivers better value.
See the tier-by-tier breakdown below to compare specific plans, or use our calculators to estimate costs: Lever calculator | Ashby calculator
Lever and Ashby compete for the attention of growing recruiting teams, but they serve different market segments with distinct pricing models. Lever is the established ATS+CRM platform favored by mid-market and enterprise companies ($5,000-$140,000/year with mandatory annual contracts and headcount-based pricing), while Ashby is the modern, analytics-first alternative designed for startups and scale-ups (free for teams under 10 employees, $300-$400/month with optional month-to-month billing). The key differentiator beyond price is approach: Lever excels at candidate relationship management and sourcing workflows, while Ashby leads with built-in advanced analytics and a faster, more modern user experience.
Pricing Tier Comparison
| Tier | Lever | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| LeverTRM | Custom | Free /month |
| LeverTRM for Enterprise | Custom | $400 |
| Enterprise | — | Custom |
Not sure between Lever and Ashby?
Tell us about your needs and we'll recommend the best option for your budget.
Our Verdict
Choose Lever if your recruiting team's primary challenge is sourcing and nurturing passive candidates through long sales cycles. Lever's native CRM, candidate nurture campaigns, and pipeline management tools are best-in-class for companies that need to build relationships with talent before they apply -- particularly mid-market and enterprise organizations (200-1,000+ employees) with dedicated sourcing teams willing to negotiate pricing aggressively for 34-66% discounts off list price.
Choose Ashby if you are a startup or fast-growing company under 500 employees that values modern UX, built-in analytics, and contract flexibility over CRM-style sourcing tools. Ashby's free tier for teams under 10 employees, month-to-month billing options, and analytics-first design make it the clear winner for cost-conscious teams that want data-driven recruiting without Lever's enterprise pricing and annual contract lock-in.
Frequently Asked Questions
01 How does Lever's CRM compare to Ashby's sourcing features?
Lever's CRM is significantly more developed than Ashby's sourcing capabilities. Lever includes native candidate relationship management with nurture campaigns, email sequences, pipeline stages for passive candidates, and sourcing analytics built into LeverTRM. Ashby offers basic sourcing and email sequences in its Growth plan but lacks the dedicated CRM pipeline that makes Lever popular with proactive sourcing teams. If sourcing passive candidates is your primary recruiting strategy, Lever is the stronger choice.
02 Is Ashby's analytics really better than Lever's?
Yes, for most use cases. Ashby's analytics dashboards are built into the core product with advanced funnel analysis, diversity reporting, and custom reporting available on the Growth plan ($400/month). Lever's base LeverTRM includes only basic analytics -- advanced reporting dashboards require the Enterprise tier ($50,000+/year) or the Advanced Analytics add-on ($9,000-$16,000/year for 500 employees). Ashby delivers comparable analytics at a fraction of the cost.
03 Can I switch from Lever to Ashby mid-contract?
Lever requires annual contracts, so switching mid-contract would incur early termination fees. Most companies plan their migration to coincide with Lever contract renewal. Ashby's onboarding process is relatively fast (1-2 weeks for small teams) and supports data import from Lever. If you are on a month-to-month Ashby plan, switching the other direction to Lever is simpler but still requires 4-6 weeks for full implementation.