Greenhouse vs Lever Pricing 2026

Complete pricing comparison between Greenhouse and Lever. Find out which ai recruiting tool is right for you.

Quick Answer

Greenhouse pricing ranges from $6000–$70000/year, while Lever ranges from $5000–$140000/year. Lever is typically 20% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.

The right choice between Greenhouse and Lever depends on your specific requirements: team size, feature needs, and integration requirements all affect which option delivers better value.

See the tier-by-tier breakdown below to compare specific plans, or use our calculators to estimate costs: Greenhouse calculator | Lever calculator

Greenhouse

$6000 - $70000/year
View Full Pricing →
VS

Lever

$5000 - $140000/year
View Full Pricing →

Greenhouse and Lever are two of the most widely adopted applicant tracking systems for mid-market and enterprise companies, yet they take meaningfully different approaches to talent acquisition. Greenhouse emphasizes structured hiring with interview scorecards, EEOC compliance analytics, and a dedicated onboarding module, while Lever bundles ATS and candidate relationship management (CRM) into a single platform focused on proactive sourcing and pipeline nurturing. Both require custom quotes based on company headcount and annual contracts, with Greenhouse ranging from $6,000-$70,000/year and Lever from $5,000-$140,000/year, making the pricing comparison highly dependent on company size and negotiation.

Pricing Tier Comparison

Tier Greenhouse Lever
Essential Custom Custom
Advanced Custom Custom
Expert Custom

Not sure between Greenhouse and Lever?

Tell us about your needs and we'll recommend the best option for your budget.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Our Verdict

Choose Greenhouse if your recruiting team prioritizes structured interviews, diversity analytics, and compliance-first hiring workflows. Greenhouse is the stronger choice for companies that want detailed interview scorecards, EEOC reporting, and a dedicated onboarding module for new hire transitions -- especially enterprises with 500+ employees that need proven integrations and a large app marketplace.

Choose Lever if your team values proactive candidate sourcing, pipeline building, and CRM-style nurture campaigns over structured interview frameworks. Lever's native CRM eliminates the need for a separate sourcing tool, and its pricing is highly negotiable (34-66% off list price according to industry data) -- making it potentially more cost-effective for mid-sized companies willing to negotiate aggressively.

Frequently Asked Questions

01 Is Greenhouse or Lever cheaper for a 200-employee company?

At list price, they are comparable. Greenhouse Advanced costs roughly $15,000-$20,000/year for a 200-employee company, while Lever LeverTRM costs $10,000-$20,000/year. However, Lever pricing is highly negotiable -- companies report 34-66% discounts off list pricing through Vendr data. A 200-employee company may negotiate Lever down to $8,000-$12,000/year, making Lever potentially cheaper after negotiation.

02 Does Greenhouse or Lever have better CRM features?

Lever has significantly better CRM features. Lever includes candidate relationship management (CRM) natively in its base LeverTRM plan, allowing sourcing, pipeline nurturing, and candidate engagement without add-ons. Greenhouse requires the Advanced or Expert plan ($15,000+/year) to access CRM-like features, and its CRM capabilities are less developed than Lever's core offering.

03 Can I switch from Greenhouse to Lever or vice versa?

Yes, but migration requires careful planning. Both platforms support data export, and several migration tools exist to transfer candidates, job history, and pipeline data. Expect 4-8 weeks for a full migration including data transfer, workflow reconfiguration, and team retraining. Both vendors require annual contracts, so time your switch to coincide with contract renewal to avoid early termination fees.

Trends