FactSet vs S&P Capital IQ Pro: Custom Pricing Compared (2026)
Compare / FactSet vs S&P Capital IQ Pro
Shortlist
Team size
25 seats

FactSet vs S&P Capital IQ Pro

Financial Data & Terminals pricing comparison · 2026 · Updated June 2026

FactSet uses custom pricing, while S&P Capital IQ Pro uses custom pricing.

Visit
See pricing on each vendor's site
Above-the-fold path — each link opens the vendor's pricing page in a new tab.
Compare
2 products · Financial Data & Terminals
Side-by-side · live
FactSet
FactSet does not publish public pricing.
verified 7d ago
View pricing →
S&P Capital IQ Pro
S&P Capital IQ Pro does not publish public pricing.
verified 7d ago
View pricing →
Estimated license cost
at 25 seats
List price × seats. Click a tier below to lock it.
Custom pricing
Custom
all tiers are quote-only
Custom pricing
Custom
all tiers are quote-only
What buyers actually pay
median, annual
Vendr deal-flow data. The real benchmark, not list price.
Median annual
$25K/yr
Vendr · n=4 · limited data
No Vendr data
Not in Vendr's deal flow
REF · 01

Sources & confidence

Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.

Where this data comes from
Vendr · TrustRadius · Reddit · BBB · official docs
Sources 2 sourced facts
Vendr median · 1 review platform
Last verified 1w ago
Confidence Limited confidence
Sources No structured sources
Last verified 1w ago
Confidence Limited confidence
REF · 02

Plans at a glance

Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.

Tier ladder
Click a tier to lock the cost row to it. Locking surfaces a tier-specific Visit CTA.
REF · 03

Hidden costs

Each cost is severity-ranked, with the dollar range quoted from its source (Vendr, Reddit, TrustRadius, BBB, official docs) — never our estimate.

Beyond the sticker
Severity-ranked, sourced
No hidden costs documented
No hidden costs documented
REF · 05

What users say

Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.

User reviews
TrustRadius · Trustpilot · G2
TrustRadius
4.3/5 (6)
Best for
Analysts and portfolio managers needing fundamental financial data
No public ratings yet
Best for
Investment bankers, equity researchers, and corporate finance professionals needing comprehensive financial data
Decide
Get a quote from each vendor
Each link opens the vendor's pricing page in a new tab.
License cost is computed from publicly listed plans (real math, list price × seats). Median annual cost is from Vendr's deal flow when available — see source badges. Hidden costs and contract terms each cite their own sources. We do not invent composite scores.
Financial Data & Terminals

FactSet

Custom pricing
/user/year
4 plans
Full pricing breakdown →
VS
Financial Data & Terminals

S&P Capital IQ Pro

Custom pricing
/user/year
2 plans
Full pricing breakdown →

FactSet and S&P Capital IQ Pro are two of the most widely adopted financial data platforms for buy-side and sell-side analysts, competing directly in screening, modeling, and fundamental research. Neither vendor publishes list prices: every FactSet configuration is quoted per user/month, while S&P Capital IQ Pro is quoted per user/year, so budgeting for either platform starts with a sales conversation.

FactSet offers four custom-quoted configurations — FactSet Workstation, FactSet Workstation with Estimates, FactSet Workstation with Analytics, and FactSet Enterprise / API — so firms pay only for the data and analytics they need. S&P Capital IQ Pro keeps the structure simpler with two tiers: Capital IQ Pro for individual professionals and Enterprise for large financial institutions with 10+ users.

Plan-by-Plan Pricing

Plan FactSet S&P Capital IQ Pro
FactSet Workstation Custom Custom
FactSet Workstation with Estimates Custom Custom
FactSet Workstation with Analytics Custom
FactSet Enterprise / API Custom

Continue researching

Our Verdict

Choose FactSet if you want a modular workstation that scales with your workflow: FactSet Workstation covers fundamental financial data for analysts and portfolio managers, FactSet Workstation with Estimates adds consensus data for buy-side analysts, FactSet Workstation with Analytics serves equity research teams and hedge funds needing risk and attribution, and FactSet Enterprise / API supports large institutions and quant funds requiring programmatic data access.

Choose S&P Capital IQ Pro if your primary workflow revolves around company screening, comparable analysis, and credit research. The Capital IQ Pro tier fits investment bankers, equity researchers, and corporate finance professionals, while the Enterprise tier adds real-time data, credit analytics, and data feed delivery for institutions with 10+ users. Both platforms are custom-quoted, so negotiate against your actual seat count and data needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

01 Is FactSet cheaper than S&P Capital IQ Pro?

FactSet can be cheaper at the entry level, starting at $4,000/year for the Basic Workstation compared to Capital IQ Pro's $12,000/year Essentials tier. However, at higher tiers the pricing converges -- FactSet's Standard plan costs $12,000/year (matching Capital IQ Essentials), and FactSet's Premium tier at $30,000/year exceeds Capital IQ Pro Advanced at $25,000/year. Total cost depends heavily on which data modules you need.

02 Which is better for investment banking and M&A analysis?

S&P Capital IQ Pro is generally preferred for investment banking workflows due to its superior company screening, deal comps databases, and seamless integration with S&P's proprietary credit ratings and financial data. FactSet is stronger for buy-side portfolio management and quantitative research, though its merger and acquisition datasets have improved significantly in recent years.

03 Can FactSet replace S&P Capital IQ Pro?

In many scenarios, yes. FactSet covers fundamental data, screening, charting, and Excel modeling that overlap with Capital IQ Pro's core functionality. However, S&P Capital IQ Pro has unique advantages in proprietary S&P credit ratings, Capital IQ's company hierarchy mapping, and its deep private company database. Teams that rely heavily on these S&P-exclusive datasets may find FactSet insufficient as a standalone replacement.