Elicit vs Scite Pricing 2026

Complete pricing comparison between Elicit and Scite. Find out which ai research tools tool is right for you.

Quick Answer

Elicit pricing ranges from $0–$79/user/month, while Scite ranges from $0–$20/user/month. Both products are similarly priced at comparable tiers.

The right choice between Elicit and Scite depends on your specific requirements: team size, feature needs, and integration requirements all affect which option delivers better value.

See the tier-by-tier breakdown below to compare specific plans, or use our calculators to estimate costs: Elicit calculator | Scite calculator

Elicit

$0 - $79/user/month
View Full Pricing →
VS

Scite

$0 - $20/user/month
View Full Pricing →

Elicit and Scite target distinct phases of the research process. Elicit ($0-$79/user/month) is a systematic review automation platform that helps researchers find, extract, and synthesize data from 138M+ papers using automated reports and structured data tables. Scite ($0-$20/user/month) is a citation analysis tool that uses NLP to classify 1.2 billion citation statements as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning, helping researchers evaluate paper reliability and research credibility. The key difference is that Elicit helps you conduct research, while Scite helps you evaluate the research others have conducted.

Pricing Tier Comparison

Tier Elicit Scite
Basic Free /user/month Free /user/month
Plus $12 /user/month $20 /user/month
Pro $49 /user/month Custom
Team $79 /user/month

Not sure between Elicit and Scite?

Tell us about your needs and we'll recommend the best option for your budget.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Our Verdict

Choose Elicit if you conduct systematic reviews or meta-analyses requiring automated reports, structured data extraction into tables, and PRISMA-compliant workflows, or if you need paper monitoring alerts to track new publications on active research topics and want a platform built specifically for evidence synthesis.

Choose Scite if your primary need is evaluating how papers are cited to assess research reliability, you need Smart Citations showing whether findings are supported or disputed by subsequent research, or you want citation context analysis and reference checking tools to verify the credibility of sources before including them in your own work.

Frequently Asked Questions

01 How do Elicit and Scite pricing compare for individual researchers?

At the individual level, both tools cost $10-$12/month on annual plans. Elicit Plus costs $10/month annual ($120/year) and includes 48 automated reports per year, unlimited search, and data extraction. Scite Individual/Plus costs $12/month annual ($144/year) and includes unlimited Smart Citations, citation reports, and reference checking. Elicit is $24/year cheaper and provides systematic review capabilities, while Scite provides unique citation context analysis. Both offer limited free tiers for testing.

02 Can Elicit and Scite replace each other?

No, Elicit and Scite serve fundamentally different purposes and cannot replace each other. Elicit automates finding and synthesizing papers for systematic reviews with data extraction tables and automated reports. Scite evaluates how existing papers are cited (supporting vs contrasting) to assess research reliability. Elicit answers 'what does the research say?' while Scite answers 'is this paper's research supported or disputed?' Many researchers use both tools together in their workflow.

03 Which tool is better for writing a research paper?

It depends on your stage. Elicit is better during the literature review and evidence synthesis phase -- use it to find relevant papers, extract data into tables, and generate automated reports summarizing findings across studies. Scite is better during the citation verification phase -- use it to check whether the papers you plan to cite have findings that are widely supported or disputed by subsequent research. For a complete workflow, start with Elicit ($10/month) to build your evidence base, then use Scite ($12/month) to verify citation reliability.

Trends