Dealogic vs FactSet (2026): $30.0k vs $4.0k — Which Wins?

Dealogic vs FactSet Pricing 2026

Complete pricing comparison between Dealogic and FactSet. Find out which financial data tool is right for you.

Dealogic pricing ranges from $30000–$150000/year, while FactSet ranges from $4000–$50000/user/year. FactSet is typically 60% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.

Dealogic

$30000 - $150000/year
View Full Pricing →
VS

FactSet

$4000 - $50000/user/year
View Full Pricing →

Comparing Dealogic and FactSet for Financial Data solutions in 2026. FactSet starts at $4000, making it more budget-friendly than Dealogic at $30000. This comparison covers pricing tiers, features, and value for different business sizes.

Pricing Tier Comparison

Tier Dealogic FactSet
Dealogic Insight $2.5K $333 /user/year
Dealogic Professional $5K $1K /user/year
Dealogic Enterprise (Cortex Platform) $8.3K $2.5K
Dealogic Data Solutions (Feeds & API) Custom Custom

Not sure? We'll help you decide and negotiate the best deal

Average client saves 22% on software contracts. No upfront cost—you only pay when we save you money.

Our Verdict

Choose Dealogic if their feature set aligns better with your use case. Choose FactSet if you want a lower starting price at $4000.

Frequently Asked Questions

01 Which is cheaper: Dealogic or FactSet?

FactSet is generally more affordable, starting at $4000 compared to Dealogic at $30000. However, pricing varies based on features and team size, so compare plans at your specific usage level.

02 How does Dealogic pricing compare to FactSet?

Dealogic offers 4 pricing tiers starting with Dealogic Insight, while FactSet has 4 tiers beginning with FactSet Workstation Basic. Dealogic's median price is around $60000 while FactSet's is $24000.

03 Which is better for small businesses: Dealogic or FactSet?

Both platforms are primarily designed for mid-market to enterprise customers. Small businesses may find the pricing ($30000+ and $4000+ respectively) challenging. Consider if lower-cost alternatives in the Financial Data category might be more suitable.